CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 48.11% year-to-date with +$135 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 31.77% with +$486 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CHPS
-4.33%-9.10%+48.11%+78.16%+199.08%
ZEB
-0.76%+8.80%+31.77%+53.68%+160.10%
Flows
CHPS
-$7 M+$40 M+$135 M+$152 M+$186 M
ZEB
+$438 M+$1,668 M+$486 M+$876 M-$278 M

CHPS vs ZEB exposure

Countries

CHPS
USA
69.15%
Taiwan
17.85%
Netherlands
9.25%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CHPS
Technology
99.95%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
20.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.85%
Broadcom Inc.
14.21%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
11.20%
ASML Holding NV
9.25%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.82%
Lam Research Corp.
5.29%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.70%
KLA Corp.
3.45%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.37%
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%

Diversification

CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.81%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CHPS
ZEB
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkPHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.01%2.32%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 22, 2021October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZEB?
As of September 4, 2026, CHPS has returned 48.11% year to date, while ZEB has returned 31.77%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZEB?
As of September 4, 2026, CHPS manages $375.31 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.45 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZEB managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and ZEB emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Technology. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZEB?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$135.04 M in net flows, compared with +$485.70 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZEB compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and ZEB?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc.. ZEB's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZEB?
CHPS holds 18 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CHPS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CHPS and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds