CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 60.85% year-to-date with +$108 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 25.29% with -$1,134 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

051015%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CHPS
+14.11%+53.52%+60.85%+118.08%+225.77%
ZEB
+8.46%+23.65%+25.29%+67.84%+147.83%
Flows
CHPS
+$44 M+$81 M+$108 M+$129 M+$157 M
ZEB
-$103 M-$237 M-$1,134 M-$935 M-$1,914 M

CHPS vs ZEB exposure

Countries

CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CHPS
ZEB
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkPHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USDSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.01%2.41%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 22, 2021October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS has returned 60.85% year to date, while ZEB has returned 25.29%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, CHPS manages $380.79 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.58 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZEB managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHPS and ZEB emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZEB?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$108.35 M in net flows, compared with -$1,133.77 M for ZEB. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZEB compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CHPS and ZEB?
CHPS's largest holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZEB?
CHPS holds 7 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CHPS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about CHPS and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds