CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page
VS
ZXLK.F
BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLK.F fund page

Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) and BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK.F) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHPS focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, while ZXLK.F leans towards Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, CHPS features a management fee (MER) of 0.64%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLK.F. Performance-wise, CHPS has returned 47.27% year-to-date with +$150 M in net flows, whereas ZXLK.F is at 29.76% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
CHPS
-8.31%+0.30%+47.27%+38.70%+233.98%
ZXLK.F
-2.67%+8.45%+29.76%+24.62%-
Flows
CHPS
+$22 M+$10 M+$150 M+$160 M+$205 M
ZXLK.F
+$0 M+$1 M+$7 M+$9 M-

CHPS vs ZXLK.F exposure

Countries

CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
ZXLK.F
USA
97.19%

Sectors

CHPS
Technology
99.99%
ZXLK.F
Technology
95.48%
As of October 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
ZXLK.F
US81369Y8030
100.00%

Diversification

CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
ZXLK.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 73 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
CHPS
ZXLK.F
ProviderGlobal XBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkPHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USDS&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Other
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.01%0.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 22, 2021February 2, 2025

Frequently asked questions about CHPS and ZXLK.F

Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHPS or ZXLK.F?
As of October 27, 2026, CHPS has returned 47.27% year to date, while ZXLK.F has returned 29.76%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHPS or ZXLK.F?
As of October 27, 2026, CHPS manages $389.52 M in assets, while ZXLK.F manages $13.06 M. CHPS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHPS and ZXLK.F managed?
CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark. ZXLK.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHPS or ZXLK.F?
CHPS holds 18 securities, while ZXLK.F holds 1. On holdings count, CHPS is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHPS or ZXLK.F?
Year to date, CHPS has seen +$150.13 M in net flows, compared with +$7.08 M for ZXLK.F. CHPS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHPS and ZXLK.F compare?
CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZXLK.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What sectors do CHPS and ZXLK.F emphasize?
CHPS is most exposed to Technology. ZXLK.F is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials.

Recent articles about CHPS and ZXLK.F

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds