VS
Global X China Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (CHQQ) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CHQQ focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, CHQQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CHQQ has returned 19.89% year-to-date with +$23 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.36% with +$425 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CHQQ
ZEB
| AuM | $28.71 M | $7,427.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.55% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CHQQ | -11.11% | -11.20% | -19.89% | - | - |
ZEB | -0.32% | +11.06% | +32.36% | +55.47% | +161.28% | |
| Flows | CHQQ | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$23 M | - | - |
ZEB | +$377 M | +$1,600 M | +$425 M | +$761 M | -$338 M |
CHQQ vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CHQQ
China
90.69%
Other
9.31%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CHQQ
Technology
45.65%
Consumer Cyclicals
24.57%
Consumer Services
13.57%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
12.06%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CHQQ
Meituan
9.97%
NetEase, Inc.
9.70%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.
9.09%
BYD Co., Ltd.
8.97%
Xiaomi Corp.
8.96%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.
8.24%
JD.com, Inc.
6.01%
Lenovo Group Ltd.
4.82%
Baidu, Inc.
4.75%
Kuaishou Technology
3.95%
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
CHQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 29 total
74.46%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CHQQ
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Hang Seng TECH Net Total Return Index - HKD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 7, 2025 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CHQQ and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CHQQ or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, CHQQ has returned -19.89% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.36%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CHQQ or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, CHQQ manages $28.71 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.43 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CHQQ and ZEB managed?
CHQQ is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Hang Seng TECH Net Total Return Index - HKD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CHQQ and ZEB emphasize?
CHQQ is most exposed to Technology, Consumer Cyclicals, and Consumer Services. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CHQQ or ZEB?
Year to date, CHQQ has seen +$23.37 M in net flows, compared with +$425.30 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CHQQ and ZEB compare?
CHQQ has an expense ratio of 0.55%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CHQQ and ZEB?
CHQQ's largest holdings include Meituan, NetEase, Inc., and Tencent Holdings Ltd.. ZEB's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: CHQQ or ZEB?
CHQQ holds 29 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CHQQ is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CHQQ and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.