VS
Compare CI First Asset CanBanc Income Class ETF (CIC) vs iShares Equal Weight Banc & Lifeco ETF (CEW) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIC and CEW provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, CIC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.55% for CEW. Performance-wise, CIC has returned 25.44% year-to-date with -$116 M in net flows, whereas CEW is at 31.67% with -$3 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIC
CEW
| AuM | $338.54 M | $421.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIC | -1.12% | -1.34% | +25.44% | +37.52% | +141.89% |
CEW | -1.39% | +0.04% | +31.67% | +46.28% | +176.76% | |
| Flows | CIC | +$2 M | -$8 M | -$116 M | -$106 M | -$16 M |
CEW | -$2 M | -$15 M | -$3 M | +$7 M | +$4 M |
CIC vs CEW exposure
Countries
CIC
Canada
100.28%
CEW
Canada
99.75%
Sectors
CIC
Finance
100.28%
CEW
Finance
99.75%
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIC
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.33%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.75%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
Bank of Montreal
16.38%
National Bank of Canada
16.34%
CEW
The Bank of Nova Scotia
10.47%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
10.41%
Great-West Lifeco, Inc.
10.10%
iA Financial Corp., Inc.
10.06%
Manulife Financial Corp.
9.98%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
9.94%
Royal Bank of Canada
9.86%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
9.76%
Bank of Montreal
9.60%
National Bank of Canada
9.56%
Diversification
CIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.28%
CEW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
99.75%
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about CIC and CEW
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIC or CEW?
As of October 21, 2026, CIC has returned 25.44% year to date, while CEW has returned 31.67%. CEW is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIC or CEW?
As of October 21, 2026, CIC manages $338.54 M in assets, while CEW manages $421.35 M. CEW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIC and CEW managed?
CIC is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. CEW is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index.
What sectors do CIC and CEW emphasize?
CIC is most exposed to Finance. CEW is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIC or CEW?
Year to date, CIC has seen -$116.44 M in net flows, compared with -$2.64 M for CEW. CEW has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIC and CEW compare?
CIC has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while CEW has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of CIC and CEW?
CIC's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. CEW's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Great-West Lifeco, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CIC or CEW?
CIC holds 6 securities, while CEW holds 10. On holdings count, CEW is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIC and CEW
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.