VS
Compare CI First Asset CanBanc Income Class ETF (CIC) vs HAMILTON CHAMPIONS Canadian Bank Equal-Weight Index ETF (HEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIC and HEB provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, CIC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.19% for HEB. Performance-wise, CIC has returned 25.44% year-to-date with -$116 M in net flows, whereas HEB is at 31.57% with -$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIC
HEB
| AuM | $338.54 M | $1,326.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.19% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.05% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.38% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIC | -1.12% | -1.34% | +25.44% | +37.52% | +141.89% |
HEB | -1.45% | -1.31% | +31.57% | +46.68% | +183.25% | |
| Flows | CIC | +$2 M | -$8 M | -$116 M | -$106 M | -$16 M |
HEB | -$34 M | -$113 M | -$11 M | +$32 M | +$52 M |
CIC vs HEB exposure
Countries
CIC
Canada
100.28%
HEB
Canada
99.79%
Sectors
CIC
Finance
100.28%
HEB
Finance
99.79%
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIC
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.33%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.75%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
Bank of Montreal
16.38%
National Bank of Canada
16.34%
HEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.52%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.39%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
16.45%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.77%
National Bank of Canada
15.40%
Diversification
CIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.28%
HEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.79%
Characteristics
Compare
CIC
HEB
| Provider | CI | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.37% | 2.68% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 18, 2010 | April 3, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CIC and HEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIC or HEB?
As of October 21, 2026, CIC has returned 25.44% year to date, while HEB has returned 31.57%. HEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIC or HEB?
As of October 21, 2026, CIC manages $338.54 M in assets, while HEB manages $1.33 B. HEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIC and HEB managed?
CIC is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. HEB is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CIC and HEB emphasize?
CIC is most exposed to Finance. HEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIC or HEB?
Year to date, CIC has seen -$116.44 M in net flows, compared with -$11.07 M for HEB. HEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIC and HEB compare?
CIC has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while HEB has an expense ratio of 0.05%.
What are the top holdings of CIC and HEB?
CIC's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. HEB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIC or HEB?
CIC holds 6 securities, while HEB holds 6. On holdings count, CIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIC and HEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.