VS
Compare CI First Asset CanBanc Income Class ETF (CIC) vs RBC Canadian Bank Yield Index ETF (RBNK) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIC and RBNK provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, CIC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.29% for RBNK. Performance-wise, CIC has returned 23.65% year-to-date with -$117 M in net flows, whereas RBNK is at 31.79% with +$19 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIC
RBNK
| AuM | $332.79 M | $504.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.29% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.32% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 4.48% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIC | -2.54% | -2.31% | +23.65% | +35.60% | +138.77% |
RBNK | -2.98% | -1.07% | +31.79% | +45.29% | +183.42% | |
| Flows | CIC | +$1 M | -$9 M | -$117 M | -$107 M | -$16 M |
RBNK | -$2 M | +$3 M | +$19 M | +$23 M | -$7 M |
CIC vs RBNK exposure
Countries
CIC
Canada
100.28%
RBNK
Canada
99.92%
Sectors
CIC
Finance
100.28%
RBNK
Finance
99.92%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIC
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.33%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.75%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
Bank of Montreal
16.38%
National Bank of Canada
16.34%
RBNK
The Bank of Nova Scotia
26.41%
Bank of Montreal
24.06%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.02%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.13%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.25%
National Bank of Canada
8.03%
Diversification
CIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.28%
RBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.92%
Characteristics
Compare
CIC
RBNK
| Provider | CI | RBC Global Asset Management |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.45% | 2.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 18, 2010 | October 20, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about CIC and RBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIC or RBNK?
As of October 20, 2026, CIC has returned 23.65% year to date, while RBNK has returned 31.79%. RBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIC or RBNK?
As of October 20, 2026, CIC manages $332.79 M in assets, while RBNK manages $504.35 M. RBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIC and RBNK managed?
CIC is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. RBNK is passively managed by RBC Global Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Canada Bank Yield Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CIC and RBNK emphasize?
CIC is most exposed to Finance. RBNK is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIC or RBNK?
Year to date, CIC has seen -$117.36 M in net flows, compared with +$19.25 M for RBNK. RBNK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIC and RBNK compare?
CIC has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while RBNK has an expense ratio of 0.32%.
What are the top holdings of CIC and RBNK?
CIC's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. RBNK's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Bank of Montreal, and The Toronto-Dominion Bank.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIC or RBNK?
CIC holds 6 securities, while RBNK holds 6. On holdings count, CIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIC and RBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.