VS
Compare CI First Asset CanBanc Income Class ETF (CIC) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CIC and ZEB provide the same top sector exposures: Finance. When evaluating costs, CIC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CIC has returned 23.65% year-to-date with -$117 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 29.41% with +$169 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIC
ZEB
| AuM | $332.79 M | $6,981.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.80% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIC | -2.54% | -2.31% | +23.65% | +35.60% | +138.77% |
ZEB | -3.03% | -2.44% | +29.41% | +44.28% | +178.22% | |
| Flows | CIC | +$1 M | -$9 M | -$117 M | -$107 M | -$16 M |
ZEB | -$429 M | -$97 M | +$169 M | +$869 M | -$819 M |
CIC vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CIC
Canada
100.28%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CIC
Finance
100.28%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIC
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.33%
Royal Bank of Canada
16.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.75%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.69%
Bank of Montreal
16.38%
National Bank of Canada
16.34%
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
CIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.28%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CIC
ZEB
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 5.45% | 2.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 18, 2010 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CIC and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIC or ZEB?
As of October 20, 2026, CIC has returned 23.65% year to date, while ZEB has returned 29.41%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIC or ZEB?
As of October 20, 2026, CIC manages $332.79 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.98 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIC and ZEB managed?
CIC is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CIC and ZEB emphasize?
CIC is most exposed to Finance. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIC or ZEB?
Year to date, CIC has seen -$117.36 M in net flows, compared with +$169.48 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIC and ZEB compare?
CIC has an expense ratio of 0.80%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of CIC and ZEB?
CIC's largest holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, Royal Bank of Canada, and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. ZEB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: CIC or ZEB?
CIC holds 6 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, CIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIC and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.