VS
iShares Global Infrastructure Index ETF (CIF) and Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD (PPLN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that CIF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Energy, and Industrials, while PPLN leans towards Energy. When evaluating costs, CIF features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, CIF has returned 18.97% year-to-date with +$424 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 22.17% with -$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CIF
PPLN
| AuM | $1,535.90 M | $129.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.74% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.31% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CIF | -3.70% | -5.34% | +18.97% | +22.26% | +97.80% |
PPLN | -3.70% | -5.86% | +22.17% | +23.30% | +50.65% | |
| Flows | CIF | -$1 M | +$98 M | +$424 M | +$526 M | +$785 M |
PPLN | -$2 M | +$14 M | -$1 M | +$68 M | +$81 M |
CIF vs PPLN exposure
Countries
CIF
USA
40.12%
Canada
34.69%
Brazil
7.87%
Other
17.32%
PPLN
Canada
99.62%
Sectors
CIF
Utilities
44.52%
Energy
26.50%
Industrials
25.50%
PPLN
Energy
99.62%
As of September 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CIF
ATCO Ltd.
5.37%
Edison International
5.33%
Enel Chile SA
4.25%
Targa Resources Corp.
4.11%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.86%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
3.66%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
3.56%
Scorpio Tankers, Inc.
3.35%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
3.23%
Keyera Corp.
3.12%
PPLN
South Bow Corp.
20.77%
Keyera Corp.
20.54%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
20.14%
TC Energy Corp.
19.71%
Enbridge, Inc.
18.46%
Diversification
CIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
39.85%
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.62%
Characteristics
Compare
CIF
PPLN
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.65% | 4.49% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 27, 2008 | July 14, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about CIF and PPLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CIF or PPLN?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF has returned 18.97% year to date, while PPLN has returned 22.17%. PPLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CIF or PPLN?
As of September 16, 2026, CIF manages $1.54 B in assets, while PPLN manages $129.50 M. CIF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CIF and PPLN managed?
CIF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MFC Global Infrastructure Index - USD benchmark. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CIF and PPLN emphasize?
CIF is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. PPLN is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CIF or PPLN?
Year to date, CIF has seen +$424.38 M in net flows, compared with -$1.46 M for PPLN. CIF has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CIF and PPLN compare?
CIF has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of CIF and PPLN?
CIF's largest holdings include ATCO Ltd., Edison International, and Enel Chile SA. PPLN's top holdings include South Bow Corp., Keyera Corp., and Pembina Pipeline Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: CIF or PPLN?
CIF holds 60 securities, while PPLN holds 5. On holdings count, CIF is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CIF and PPLN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.