VS
When evaluating costs, CINF features a management fee (MER) of 0.7%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, CINF has returned 14.4% year-to-date with +$35 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 25.92% with +$42 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CINF
PPLN
| AuM | $472.71 M | $178.62 M |
| Management Fees | 0.70% | 0.74% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.26% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CINF | +1.79% | -2.35% | +14.40% | +10.63% | +61.15% |
PPLN | +3.08% | -6.88% | +25.92% | +29.21% | +62.33% | |
| Flows | CINF | +$10 M | +$25 M | +$35 M | +$37 M | +$57 M |
PPLN | +$44 M | +$45 M | +$42 M | +$111 M | +$123 M |
CINF vs PPLN exposure
Countries
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Canada
99.58%
Sectors
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Energy
99.58%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Keyera Corp.
21.24%
South Bow Corp.
20.80%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
19.93%
Enbridge, Inc.
18.81%
TC Energy Corp.
18.80%
Diversification
CINF
Exposure data will be available soon
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.58%
Characteristics
Compare
CINF
PPLN
| Provider | CI | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.50% | 4.34% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 12, 2020 | July 14, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about CINF and PPLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CINF or PPLN?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF has returned 14.40% year to date, while PPLN has returned 25.92%. PPLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CINF or PPLN?
As of October 16, 2026, CINF manages $472.71 M in assets, while PPLN manages $178.62 M. CINF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CINF and PPLN managed?
CINF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CINF or PPLN?
Year to date, CINF has seen +$34.82 M in net flows, compared with +$41.56 M for PPLN. PPLN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CINF and PPLN compare?
CINF has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Recent articles about CINF and PPLN
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Posted 3 days ago by Kyle Anthony inDividends
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.