VS
When evaluating costs, CLSF features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLSF
ZEB
| AuM | $0.99 M | $6,880.39 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.00% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSF | - | - | - | - | - |
ZEB | -3.81% | -3.23% | +28.36% | +43.11% | +169.08% | |
| Flows | CLSF | - | - | - | - | - |
ZEB | -$473 M | -$141 M | +$125 M | +$824 M | -$825 M |
CLSF vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CLSF
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CLSF
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLSF
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
CLSF
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CLSF
ZEB
| Provider | CI | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 2.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | - | No |
| Inception Date | October 15, 2026 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CLSF and ZEB
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLSF or ZEB?
As of October 19, 2026, CLSF manages $0.99 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.88 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLSF and ZEB managed?
CLSF is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of CLSF and ZEB compare?
CLSF has an expense ratio of 1.00%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about CLSF and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.