VS
When evaluating costs, CLSF.U features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLSF.U
XIC
| AuM | $1.39 M | $36,776.80 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.00% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLSF.U | - | - | - | - | - |
XIC | +0.43% | +3.80% | +15.78% | +21.31% | +104.40% | |
| Flows | CLSF.U | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
XIC | +$2,556 M | +$4,710 M | +$11,241 M | +$12,268 M | +$17,398 M |
CLSF.U vs XIC exposure
Countries
CLSF.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.58%
Sectors
CLSF.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLSF.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%
Diversification
CLSF.U
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%
Characteristics
Compare
CLSF.U
XIC
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 15, 2026 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CLSF.U and XIC
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CLSF.U or XIC?
Year to date, CLSF.U has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$11,240.85 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CLSF.U and XIC compare?
CLSF.U has an expense ratio of 1.00%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLSF.U or XIC?
As of October 20, 2026, CLSF.U manages $1.39 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.78 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLSF.U and XIC managed?
CLSF.U is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Recent articles about CLSF.U and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.