VS
Compare iShares US Fundamental Index ETF (CLU) vs CI Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Index ETF (EQL) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CLU provides Finance, Technology, and Healthcare exposures, while EQL is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, CLU features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.25% for EQL. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CLU
EQL
| AuM | $111.11 M | $1,967.75 M |
| Management Fees | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.26% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | -0.61% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CLU | +0.63% | - | - | - | - |
EQL | -2.35% | +4.43% | +15.92% | +18.72% | +53.86% | |
| Flows | CLU | +$110 M | - | - | - | - |
EQL | +$123 M | +$203 M | +$306 M | +$355 M | +$1,129 M |
CLU vs EQL exposure
Countries
CLU
USA
93.61%
EQL
USA
94.22%
Sectors
CLU
Finance
23.39%
Technology
19.11%
Healthcare
12.33%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.55%
Industrials
7.16%
Other
27.47%
EQL
Finance
21.56%
Technology
14.33%
Industrials
13.17%
Healthcare
12.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.78%
Other
30.85%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CLU
Microsoft Corp.
2.62%
Apple, Inc.
2.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.37%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
2.20%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.66%
UnitedHealth Group, Inc.
1.66%
US30233Q1085
1.62%
Bank of America Corp.
1.37%
Intel Corp.
1.17%
Chevron Corp.
1.16%
EQL
PayPal Holdings, Inc.
0.28%
Global Payments, Inc.
0.27%
Expedia Group, Inc.
0.27%
Bio-Techne Corp.
0.26%
IQVIA Holdings, Inc.
0.26%
International Paper Co.
0.26%
Genuine Parts Co.
0.25%
GoDaddy, Inc.
0.25%
Zebra Technologies Corp.
0.25%
The Travelers Cos., Inc.
0.25%
Diversification
CLU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,006 total
18.44%
EQL
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
2.59%
Characteristics
Compare
CLU
EQL
| Provider | iShares | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD Hedged | S&P 500 Equal Weight CAD TR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.24% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 6, 2026 | May 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about CLU and EQL
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CLU or EQL?
As of September 2, 2026, CLU manages $111.11 M in assets, while EQL manages $1.97 B. EQL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CLU and EQL managed?
CLU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the RAFI Fundamental Select US 1000 Index NTR - CAD Hedged benchmark. EQL is passively managed by CI. It tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weight CAD TR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CLU and EQL emphasize?
CLU is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Healthcare. EQL is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
How do the fees of CLU and EQL compare?
CLU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while EQL has an expense ratio of 0.26%.
What are the top holdings of CLU and EQL?
CLU's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., Apple, Inc., and Amazon.com, Inc.. EQL's top holdings include PayPal Holdings, Inc. and Global Payments, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CLU or EQL?
CLU holds 985 securities, while EQL holds 495. On holdings count, CLU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CLU and EQL
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.