VS
When evaluating costs, CNCC features a management fee (MER) of 0.84%, compared to 0.65% for UMAX. Performance-wise, CNCC has returned 14.6% year-to-date with +$50 M in net flows, whereas UMAX is at 5.48% with +$486 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CNCC
UMAX
| AuM | $196.72 M | $1,445.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.84% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.77% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNCC | +2.66% | +2.52% | +14.60% | +18.89% | +62.97% |
UMAX | +4.03% | -4.83% | +5.48% | +5.46% | +33.91% | |
| Flows | CNCC | +$4 M | +$6 M | +$50 M | +$55 M | +$111 M |
UMAX | -$16 M | +$124 M | +$486 M | +$609 M | +$1,456 M |
CNCC vs UMAX exposure
Countries
CNCC
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CNCC
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CNCC
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CNCC
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CNCC
UMAX
| Provider | Global X | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 6.66% | 14.57% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 17, 2011 | June 14, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about CNCC and UMAX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CNCC or UMAX?
As of October 27, 2026, CNCC has returned 14.60% year to date, while UMAX has returned 5.48%. CNCC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CNCC or UMAX?
As of October 27, 2026, CNCC manages $196.72 M in assets, while UMAX manages $1.45 B. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CNCC and UMAX managed?
CNCC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CNCC or UMAX?
Year to date, CNCC has seen +$49.69 M in net flows, compared with +$485.50 M for UMAX. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CNCC and UMAX compare?
CNCC has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.77%.
Recent articles about CNCC and UMAX
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.