VS
When evaluating costs, CNDU features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.65% for HCAL. Performance-wise, CNDU has returned 30.11% year-to-date with +$5 M in net flows, whereas HCAL is at 36.13% with -$62 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CNDU
HCAL
| AuM | $95.84 M | $979.05 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.61% | 0.82% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNDU | +2.12% | +6.60% | +30.11% | +40.47% | +227.14% |
HCAL | -3.88% | -3.37% | +36.13% | +55.32% | +239.18% | |
| Flows | CNDU | +$8 M | +$5 M | +$5 M | +$8 M | -$11 M |
HCAL | -$19 M | -$72 M | -$62 M | -$55 M | -$93 M |
CNDU vs HCAL exposure
Countries
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
HCAL
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CNDU
HCAL
| Provider | Global X | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 3.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 8, 2007 | October 14, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about CNDU and HCAL
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CNDU or HCAL?
As of October 20, 2026, CNDU has returned 30.11% year to date, while HCAL has returned 36.13%. HCAL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CNDU or HCAL?
As of October 20, 2026, CNDU manages $95.84 M in assets, while HCAL manages $979.05 M. HCAL is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CNDU and HCAL managed?
CNDU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. HCAL is passively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CNDU or HCAL?
Year to date, CNDU has seen +$5.47 M in net flows, compared with -$61.53 M for HCAL. CNDU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CNDU and HCAL compare?
CNDU has an expense ratio of 1.61%, while HCAL has an expense ratio of 0.82%.
Recent articles about CNDU and HCAL
How Inverse and Leveraged ETFs Work: Use Cases, Risks and ETFs to Consider
Short-term traders can use Inverse and Leveraged ETFs strategically, but these complex instruments require careful handling. Let's explore how they work and share some examples you can consider.
Posted on 7/3/2024 by Kyle Anthony inAsset classes
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.