VS
When evaluating costs, CNDU features a management fee (MER) of 1.15%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, CNDU has returned 28.14% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 30.38% with +$444 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CNDU
ZEB
| AuM | $86.32 M | $7,334.93 M |
| Management Fees | 1.15% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.61% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CNDU | +0.93% | +6.88% | +28.14% | +53.38% | +183.48% |
ZEB | -1.81% | +8.90% | +30.38% | +54.61% | +157.36% | |
| Flows | CNDU | -$3 M | -$3 M | -$3 M | +$2 M | -$19 M |
ZEB | +$396 M | +$1,654 M | +$444 M | +$651 M | -$319 M |
CNDU vs ZEB exposure
Countries
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
CNDU
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
CNDU
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Capitalization | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.34% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 8, 2007 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about CNDU and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CNDU or ZEB?
As of September 2, 2026, CNDU has returned 28.14% year to date, while ZEB has returned 30.38%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CNDU or ZEB?
As of September 2, 2026, CNDU manages $86.32 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.33 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CNDU and ZEB managed?
CNDU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P/TSX 60 Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CNDU or ZEB?
Year to date, CNDU has seen -$2.53 M in net flows, compared with +$444.26 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CNDU and ZEB compare?
CNDU has an expense ratio of 1.61%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about CNDU and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.