VS
When evaluating costs, CSBG features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.39% for FGRO. Performance-wise, CSBG has returned 5.88% year-to-date with +$0 M in net flows, whereas FGRO is at 12.9% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CSBG
FGRO
| AuM | $1.55 M | $5,577.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.90% | 0.42% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 29, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CSBG | -0.69% | +1.68% | +5.88% | +5.20% | +46.72% |
FGRO | +0.73% | +2.58% | +12.90% | +13.42% | +79.50% | |
| Flows | CSBG | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M |
FGRO | +$109 M | +$387 M | +$1,853 M | +$2,266 M | +$4,488 M |
CSBG vs FGRO exposure
Countries
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 29, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
CSBG
Exposure data will be available soon
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
CSBG
FGRO
| Provider | CIBC | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.62% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | July 19, 2021 | January 12, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about CSBG and FGRO
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CSBG or FGRO?
As of October 29, 2026, CSBG has returned 5.88% year to date, while FGRO has returned 12.90%. FGRO is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CSBG or FGRO?
As of October 29, 2026, CSBG manages $1.55 M in assets, while FGRO manages $5.58 B. FGRO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CSBG and FGRO managed?
CSBG is actively managed by CIBC. It does not track an index. FGRO is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CSBG or FGRO?
Year to date, CSBG has seen +$0.00 M in net flows, compared with +$1,853.06 M for FGRO. FGRO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CSBG and FGRO compare?
CSBG has an expense ratio of 0.90%, while FGRO has an expense ratio of 0.42%.
Recent articles about CSBG and FGRO
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.