Compare CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA) vs Franklin FTSE U.S. Index ETF (FLAM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CUSA and FLAM provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CUSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.07% for FLAM. Performance-wise, CUSA has returned 8.03% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas FLAM is at 10.81% with -$53 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUSA
FLAM
| AuM | $6.89 M | $410.60 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.07% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | 0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUSA | +0.45% | +11.21% | +8.03% | +21.57% | - |
FLAM | +2.63% | +14.56% | +10.81% | +26.74% | +85.33% | |
| Flows | CUSA | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | - |
FLAM | -$24 M | -$53 M | -$53 M | -$37 M | -$24 M |
CUSA vs FLAM exposure
Countries
CUSA
USA
96.78%
FLAM
USA
96.79%
Sectors
CUSA
Information Technology
35.48%
Communication Services
11.40%
Consumer Discretionary
10.14%
Financials
9.58%
Health Care
8.52%
Industrials
7.96%
Other
16.92%
FLAM
Information Technology
36.34%
Communication Services
10.86%
Consumer Discretionary
10.10%
Financials
10.01%
Health Care
8.35%
Industrials
7.73%
Other
16.61%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUSA
NVIDIA
7.52%
APPLE
6.30%
MICROSOFT-T
4.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.61%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.10%
META PLATFORMS
2.14%
TESLA
1.78%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.37%
FLAM
NVIDIA
8.25%
APPLE
6.27%
MICROSOFT-T
5.12%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.07%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.32%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.15%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.68%
META PLATFORMS
2.41%
TESLA
1.73%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.42%
Diversification
CUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.88%
FLAM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 495 total
38.42%
Characteristics
Compare
CUSA
FLAM
| Provider | CI | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD | FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.88% | 0.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about CUSA and FLAM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CUSA or FLAM?
As of June 12, 2026, CUSA has returned 8.03% year to date, while FLAM has returned 10.81%. FLAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUSA or FLAM?
As of June 12, 2026, CUSA manages $6.89 M in assets, while FLAM manages $410.60 M. FLAM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUSA and FLAM managed?
CUSA is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark. FLAM is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CUSA and FLAM emphasize?
CUSA is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. FLAM is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CUSA or FLAM?
Year to date, CUSA has seen +$4.05 M in net flows, compared with -$53.35 M for FLAM. CUSA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CUSA and FLAM compare?
CUSA has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while FLAM has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of CUSA and FLAM?
CUSA's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. FLAM's top holdings include NVIDIA, APPLE, and ALPHABET INC-CL.
Which ETF is more diversified: CUSA or FLAM?
CUSA holds 466 securities, while FLAM holds 461. On holdings count, CUSA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CUSA and FLAM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.