VS
Compare CI U.S. 500 Index ETF (CUSA) vs Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CUSA and QUU provide the same top sector exposures: Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, CUSA features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, CUSA has returned 5.61% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas QUU is at 10.28% with +$513 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CUSA
QUU
| AuM | $6.74 M | $6,000.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.03% | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 9, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CUSA | -1.99% | +6.92% | +5.61% | +18.95% | - |
QUU | +1.81% | +12.07% | +10.28% | +26.65% | +88.19% | |
| Flows | CUSA | +$3 M | +$3 M | +$4 M | +$4 M | - |
QUU | -$0 M | +$139 M | +$513 M | +$1,096 M | +$1,385 M |
CUSA vs QUU exposure
Countries
CUSA
USA
96.78%
QUU
USA
97.17%
Sectors
CUSA
Information Technology
35.48%
Communication Services
11.40%
Consumer Discretionary
10.14%
Financials
9.58%
Health Care
8.52%
Industrials
7.96%
Other
16.92%
QUU
Information Technology
35.37%
Communication Services
11.28%
Consumer Discretionary
10.03%
Financials
9.57%
Health Care
8.65%
Industrials
8.19%
Other
16.91%
As of June 9, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CUSA
NVIDIA
7.52%
APPLE
6.30%
MICROSOFT-T
4.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.61%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.13%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.10%
META PLATFORMS
2.14%
TESLA
1.78%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.37%
QUU
NVIDIA
7.53%
APPLE
6.28%
MICROSOFT-T
4.83%
AMAZON.COM INC
4.09%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.61%
BROADCOM LIMITED
3.14%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.11%
META PLATFORMS
2.15%
TESLA
1.79%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.37%
Diversification
CUSA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.88%
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
37.90%
Characteristics
Compare
CUSA
QUU
| Provider | CI | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.90% | 0.90% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2024 | January 24, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about CUSA and QUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CUSA or QUU?
As of June 9, 2026, CUSA has returned 5.61% year to date, while QUU has returned 10.28%. QUU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CUSA or QUU?
As of June 9, 2026, CUSA manages $6.74 M in assets, while QUU manages $6.00 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CUSA and QUU managed?
CUSA is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 Hedged to CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CUSA and QUU emphasize?
CUSA is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. QUU is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CUSA or QUU?
Year to date, CUSA has seen +$4.05 M in net flows, compared with +$513.18 M for QUU. QUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CUSA and QUU compare?
CUSA has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of CUSA and QUU?
CUSA's largest holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE. QUU's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: CUSA or QUU?
CUSA holds 466 securities, while QUU holds 471. On holdings count, QUU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CUSA and QUU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.