VS
Compare iShares Global Water Index ETF (CWW) vs iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. CWW provides Utilities, Industrials, and Non-Energy Materials exposures, while XIC is primarily weighted in Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, CWW features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, CWW has returned 3.86% year-to-date with -$17 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 14.31% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
CWW
XIC
| AuM | $286.88 M | $36,402.29 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.82% | -2.17% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | CWW | +1.06% | -1.30% | +3.86% | +2.01% | +51.07% |
XIC | +1.24% | +0.84% | +14.31% | +20.62% | +104.29% | |
| Flows | CWW | -$7 M | -$8 M | -$17 M | -$21 M | -$118 M |
XIC | +$977 M | +$4,453 M | +$11,333 M | +$12,581 M | +$17,472 M |
CWW vs XIC exposure
Countries
CWW
USA
55.31%
United Kingdom
14.34%
Brazil
10.67%
Other
19.68%
XIC
Canada
96.55%
Sectors
CWW
Utilities
46.38%
Industrials
34.66%
Non-Energy Materials
15.26%
XIC
Finance
41.17%
Non-Energy Materials
18.24%
Energy
16.19%
Industrials
8.03%
Other
16.38%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
CWW
American Water Works Co., Inc.
8.09%
Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP
7.70%
Xylem, Inc.
7.03%
Essential Utilities, Inc.
5.84%
United Utilities Group Plc
5.83%
Severn Trent Plc
5.27%
Veralto Corp.
4.76%
Ecolab, Inc.
4.13%
Geberit AG
3.61%
Watts Water Technologies, Inc.
3.41%
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.73%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.48%
Shopify, Inc.
5.07%
Bank of Montreal
3.32%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.14%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.92%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.85%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.75%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.63%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.25%
Diversification
CWW
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 66 total
55.67%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 216 total
38.13%
Characteristics
Compare
CWW
XIC
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global Water Total Return Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.30% | 1.98% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | June 4, 2007 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about CWW and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: CWW or XIC?
As of October 30, 2026, CWW has returned 3.86% year to date, while XIC has returned 14.31%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: CWW or XIC?
As of October 30, 2026, CWW manages $286.88 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.40 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are CWW and XIC managed?
CWW is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global Water Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do CWW and XIC emphasize?
CWW is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Non-Energy Materials. XIC is most exposed to Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: CWW or XIC?
Year to date, CWW has seen -$16.54 M in net flows, compared with +$11,332.62 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of CWW and XIC compare?
CWW has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of CWW and XIC?
CWW's largest holdings include American Water Works Co., Inc., Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado de Sao Paulo SABESP, and Xylem, Inc.. XIC's top holdings include Royal Bank of Canada, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Shopify, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: CWW or XIC?
CWW holds 66 securities, while XIC holds 216. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about CWW and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.