VS
Compare Desjardins American Mid Cap Equity Index ETF (DMID) vs iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. DMID and XMC.U provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, DMID features a management fee (MER) of 0.1%, compared to 0.15% for XMC.U. Performance-wise, DMID has returned 10.96% year-to-date with +$22 M in net flows, whereas XMC.U is at 11.75% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
DMID
XMC.U
| AuM | $456.07 M | $40.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.10% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.02% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.63% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DMID | +0.25% | -2.60% | +10.96% | +10.66% | - |
XMC.U | +1.91% | -2.45% | +11.75% | +14.75% | +61.59% | |
| Flows | DMID | +$18 M | +$57 M | +$22 M | +$63 M | - |
XMC.U | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | +$4 M | +$29 M |
DMID vs XMC.U exposure
Countries
DMID
USA
94.71%
XMC.U
USA
96.19%
Sectors
DMID
Finance
22.07%
Industrials
16.56%
Technology
14.98%
Healthcare
13.64%
Non-Energy Materials
8.53%
Other
24.22%
XMC.U
Finance
22.43%
Industrials
16.46%
Technology
15.76%
Non-Energy Materials
10.10%
Healthcare
10.06%
Other
25.20%
As of October 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
DMID
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.60%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.58%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.55%
Viatris, Inc.
0.54%
Roku, Inc.
0.54%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.52%
Snap-On, Inc.
0.50%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.49%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
ITT, Inc.
0.47%
XMC.U
US4642875078
99.93%
Diversification
DMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 395 total
5.28%
XMC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
99.93%
Characteristics
Compare
DMID
XMC.U
| Provider | Desjardins Investments | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive GBS United States 400 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD | S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.09% | 0.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 28, 2025 | October 22, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about DMID and XMC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DMID or XMC.U?
As of October 30, 2026, DMID has returned 10.96% year to date, while XMC.U has returned 11.75%. XMC.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DMID or XMC.U?
As of October 30, 2026, DMID manages $456.07 M in assets, while XMC.U manages $40.73 M. DMID is the larger fund by AUM.
How are DMID and XMC.U managed?
DMID is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 400 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark. XMC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: DMID or XMC.U?
DMID holds 391 securities, while XMC.U holds 1. On holdings count, DMID is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DMID or XMC.U?
Year to date, DMID has seen +$22.30 M in net flows, compared with +$5.33 M for XMC.U. DMID has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of DMID and XMC.U compare?
DMID has an expense ratio of 0.02%, while XMC.U has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What sectors do DMID and XMC.U emphasize?
DMID is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. XMC.U is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about DMID and XMC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.