When evaluating costs, DXN features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 1.5% for NNRG.U. Performance-wise, DXN has returned 6.83% year-to-date with -$3 M in net flows, whereas NNRG.U is at 55.43% with +$63 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $22.32 M | $491.37 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 1.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.93% | 1.79% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | DXN | +3.56% | -3.89% | +6.83% | +4.25% | +47.77% |
NNRG.U | +9.37% | +14.08% | +55.43% | +69.67% | +76.94% | |
| Flows | DXN | +$0 M | +$1 M | -$3 M | -$9 M | -$10 M |
NNRG.U | +$6 M | +$1 M | +$63 M | +$44 M | -$164 M |
DXN vs NNRG.U exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | Dynamic Funds | Ninepoint Partners |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 20, 2020 | February 25, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about DXN and NNRG.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: DXN or NNRG.U?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: DXN or NNRG.U?
How are DXN and NNRG.U managed?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: DXN or NNRG.U?
How do the fees of DXN and NNRG.U compare?
Recent articles about DXN and NNRG.U
Canada's Economic Comeback: 5 ETFs Riding the Minerals and Energy Opportunity
Canada is putting its natural resources and economic ambitions to work. From critical minerals to new oil export routes, five ETFs offer investors different ways to tap into the shift.
Oil ETFs Rally as Gold and Silver Retreat in Volatile Week
Canadian energy ETFs rallied alongside oil prices last week as sanctions on Russia tightened global supply expectations, while precious metals corrected sharply following record highs and easing safe-haven demand.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.