VS
When evaluating costs, EACC features a management fee (MER) of 0.49%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, EACC has returned 12.4% year-to-date with +$47 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 32.36% with +$425 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EACC
ZEB
| AuM | $107.86 M | $7,427.67 M |
| Management Fees | 0.49% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.63% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.54% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EACC | -0.93% | +4.55% | +12.40% | +20.09% | - |
ZEB | -0.32% | +11.06% | +32.36% | +55.47% | +161.28% | |
| Flows | EACC | +$3 M | +$12 M | +$47 M | +$65 M | - |
ZEB | +$377 M | +$1,600 M | +$425 M | +$761 M | -$338 M |
EACC vs ZEB exposure
Countries
EACC
Other
100.00%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
EACC
Other
100.00%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EACC
CA37962B1031
100.44%
ZEB
Royal Bank of Canada
17.39%
Bank of Montreal
17.03%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.96%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.51%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.09%
National Bank of Canada
16.03%
Diversification
EACC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1 total
100.44%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
EACC
ZEB
| Provider | Global X | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 7.57% | 2.31% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 21, 2024 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about EACC and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EACC or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, EACC has returned 12.40% year to date, while ZEB has returned 32.36%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EACC or ZEB?
As of September 3, 2026, EACC manages $107.86 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.43 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EACC and ZEB managed?
EACC is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EACC or ZEB?
Year to date, EACC has seen +$46.87 M in net flows, compared with +$425.30 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EACC and ZEB compare?
EACC has an expense ratio of 0.63%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Which ETF is more diversified: EACC or ZEB?
EACC holds 1 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about EACC and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.