When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 1.25% for BTCQ. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 12.96% year-to-date with -$17 M in net flows, whereas BTCQ is at 14.24% with -$40 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
BTCQ
| AuM | $181.85 M | $214.75 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 1.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 1.47% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -4.96% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | -13.37% | +17.16% | -12.96% | -27.48% | +112.82% |
BTCQ | -11.54% | +17.23% | -14.24% | -26.07% | +106.64% | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$8 M | -$13 M | -$17 M | -$4 M | -$95 M |
BTCQ | -$2 M | -$33 M | -$40 M | -$45 M | -$134 M |
EBIT vs BTCQ exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
BTCQ
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | 3iQ |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Capitalization |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | March 31, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and BTCQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or BTCQ?
As of November 6, 2026, EBIT has returned -12.96% year to date, while BTCQ has returned -14.24%. EBIT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or BTCQ?
As of November 6, 2026, EBIT manages $181.85 M in assets, while BTCQ manages $214.75 M. BTCQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and BTCQ managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. BTCQ is passively managed by 3iQ. It tracks the MarketVector Bitcoin Benchmark Rate - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or BTCQ?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$16.52 M in net flows, compared with -$39.84 M for BTCQ. EBIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and BTCQ compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while BTCQ has an expense ratio of 1.47%.
Recent articles about EBIT and BTCQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.