When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.4% for BTCX. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 11.98% year-to-date with -$11 M in net flows, whereas BTCX is at 11.96% with +$10 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
BTCX
| AuM | $187.52 M | $13.70 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | +10.55% | -11.82% | -11.98% | -18.75% | +171.89% |
BTCX | +11.67% | -12.03% | -11.96% | - | - | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$0 M | -$5 M | -$11 M | +$8 M | -$61 M |
BTCX | +$1 M | +$10 M | +$10 M | - | - |
EBIT vs BTCX exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
BTCX
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | CI |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | Bloomberg Galaxy Bitcoin Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | August 22, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and BTCX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or BTCX?
As of April 24, 2026, EBIT has returned -11.98% year to date, while BTCX has returned -11.96%. BTCX is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or BTCX?
As of April 24, 2026, EBIT manages $187.52 M in assets, while BTCX manages $13.70 M. EBIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and BTCX managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. BTCX is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Bitcoin Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or BTCX?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$10.55 M in net flows, compared with +$9.91 M for BTCX. BTCX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and BTCX compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while BTCX has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Recent articles about EBIT and BTCX
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.