When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 1.1% for BTCY.U. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 12.96% year-to-date with -$17 M in net flows, whereas BTCY.U is at 25.01% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
BTCY.U
| AuM | $181.85 M | $6.75 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 1.10% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 1.43% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | -13.37% | +17.16% | -12.96% | -27.48% | +112.82% |
BTCY.U | -13.69% | +15.56% | -25.01% | -38.67% | +23.81% | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$8 M | -$13 M | -$17 M | -$4 M | -$95 M |
BTCY.U | -$0 M | -$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | -$2 M |
EBIT vs BTCY.U exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCY.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCY.U
Exposure data will be available soon
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCY.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
BTCY.U
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
BTCY.U
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Cryptocurrencies |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 4.67% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | December 2, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and BTCY.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or BTCY.U?
As of November 5, 2026, EBIT has returned -12.96% year to date, while BTCY.U has returned -25.01%. EBIT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or BTCY.U?
As of November 5, 2026, EBIT manages $181.85 M in assets, while BTCY.U manages $6.75 M. EBIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and BTCY.U managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. BTCY.U is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or BTCY.U?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$16.52 M in net flows, compared with +$1.92 M for BTCY.U. BTCY.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and BTCY.U compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while BTCY.U has an expense ratio of 1.43%.
Recent articles about EBIT and BTCY.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.