EBIT
Evolve Bitcoin ETF

Full EBIT fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 12.18% year-to-date with -$11 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 7.64% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EBIT
+11.99%-1.37%-12.18%-21.56%+162.40%
XIC
+2.98%+5.89%+7.64%+39.94%+78.93%
Flows
EBIT
-$1 M+$2 M-$11 M+$7 M-$48 M
XIC
+$1,120 M+$4,114 M+$5,138 M+$7,706 M+$11,101 M

EBIT vs XIC exposure

Countries

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
98.95%

Sectors

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Financials
28.13%
Energy
18.01%
Materials
15.92%
Other
13.03%
Other
24.92%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
ROYAL BK CANADA
6.69%
TORONTO DOMINION
4.64%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
4.31%
ENBRIDGE
3.50%
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
3.01%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.01%
BANK OF MONTREAL
2.83%
CA11271J1075
2.65%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
2.61%
BNS
2.53%

Diversification

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
35.80%

Characteristics

Compare
EBIT
XIC
ProviderEvolve ETFsiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USDS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyNo incomeDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%2.08%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 19, 2021February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about EBIT and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or XIC?
As of May 1, 2026, EBIT has returned -12.18% year to date, while XIC has returned 7.64%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or XIC?
As of May 1, 2026, EBIT manages $186.43 M in assets, while XIC manages $28.76 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and XIC managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or XIC?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$11.21 M in net flows, compared with +$5,138.12 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and XIC compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about EBIT and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds