When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 14.29% year-to-date with -$10 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 14.48% with -$1,013 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
ZEB
| AuM | $182.70 M | $5,232.53 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.67% |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | +10.59% | -7.93% | -14.29% | -21.05% | +156.10% |
ZEB | +10.87% | +12.99% | +14.48% | +66.34% | +117.81% | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$0 M | +$3 M | -$10 M | +$8 M | -$47 M |
ZEB | -$511 M | -$1,076 M | -$1,013 M | -$1,828 M | -$1,438 M |
EBIT vs ZEB exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
ZEB
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.63% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or ZEB?
As of April 30, 2026, EBIT has returned -14.29% year to date, while ZEB has returned 14.48%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or ZEB?
As of April 30, 2026, EBIT manages $182.70 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.23 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and ZEB managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or ZEB?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$10.45 M in net flows, compared with -$1,012.88 M for ZEB. EBIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and ZEB compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about EBIT and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.