EBIT
Evolve Bitcoin ETF

Full EBIT fund page
VS
ZSP
BMO S&P 500 Index ETF

Full ZSP fund page

When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 12.18% year-to-date with -$11 M in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 4.87% with +$471 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EBIT
+11.99%-1.37%-12.18%-21.56%+162.40%
ZSP
+7.68%+3.24%+4.87%+27.90%+79.73%
Flows
EBIT
-$1 M+$2 M-$11 M+$7 M-$48 M
ZSP
+$277 M+$139 M+$471 M+$1,543 M+$4,694 M

EBIT vs ZSP exposure

Countries

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
USA
96.98%

Sectors

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Information Technology
33.63%
Financials
10.49%
Communication Services
10.10%
Consumer Discretionary
9.94%
Health Care
9.40%
Industrials
8.34%
Other
18.10%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
NVIDIA
7.39%
APPLE
6.67%
MICROSOFT-T
4.90%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.93%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.56%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.35%
META PLATFORMS
2.16%
TESLA
1.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHWAY
1.60%

Diversification

EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
36.04%

Characteristics

Compare
EBIT
ZSP
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USDS&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassCryptocurrenciesEquity
Dividend PolicyNo incomeDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%0.80%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 19, 2021November 14, 2012

Frequently asked questions about EBIT and ZSP

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or ZSP?
As of May 1, 2026, EBIT has returned -12.18% year to date, while ZSP has returned 4.87%. ZSP is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or ZSP?
As of May 1, 2026, EBIT manages $186.43 M in assets, while ZSP manages $22.53 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and ZSP managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or ZSP?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$11.21 M in net flows, compared with +$470.95 M for ZSP. ZSP has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and ZSP compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.

Recent articles about EBIT and ZSP

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds