VS
When evaluating costs, EBIT features a management fee (MER) of 1%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, EBIT has returned 25.71% year-to-date with -$4 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 17.94% with -$100 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EBIT
ZUT
| AuM | $165.53 M | $847.51 M |
| Management Fees | 1.00% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.53% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.82% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EBIT | +2.54% | -18.92% | -25.71% | -43.39% | +120.35% |
ZUT | -2.51% | +1.60% | +17.94% | +22.82% | +54.72% | |
| Flows | EBIT | -$0 M | +$7 M | -$4 M | +$27 M | -$55 M |
ZUT | +$27 M | -$37 M | -$100 M | -$29 M | +$216 M |
EBIT vs ZUT exposure
Countries
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%
Sectors
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of August 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%
Diversification
EBIT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%
Characteristics
Compare
EBIT
ZUT
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | No income | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 19, 2021 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about EBIT and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBIT or ZUT?
As of August 6, 2026, EBIT has returned -25.71% year to date, while ZUT has returned 17.94%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBIT or ZUT?
As of August 6, 2026, EBIT manages $165.53 M in assets, while ZUT manages $847.51 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBIT and ZUT managed?
EBIT is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate Index - USD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBIT or ZUT?
Year to date, EBIT has seen -$3.67 M in net flows, compared with -$100.29 M for ZUT. EBIT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBIT and ZUT compare?
EBIT has an expense ratio of 1.53%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about EBIT and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.