EBNK
Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF

Full EBNK fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF (EBNK) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that EBNK focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, EBNK features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, EBNK has returned 0.38% year-to-date with +$21 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 12.82% with -$917 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0510%Mar 24Mar 31Apr 8Apr 15Apr 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 24, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
EBNK
+6.44%-2.96%-0.38%+34.50%+93.20%
ZEB
+11.34%+12.03%+12.82%+67.83%+114.74%
Flows
EBNK
+$2 M+$13 M+$21 M+$68 M+$78 M
ZEB
-$186 M-$913 M-$917 M-$2,240 M-$1,205 M

EBNK vs ZEB exposure

Countries

EBNK
United Kingdom
19.51%
Spain
15.21%
France
15.06%
Italy
9.46%
Other
40.76%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

EBNK
Financials
95.72%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of April 24, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

EBNK
DNB BANK
5.94%
HSBC HOLDINGS
5.38%
DANSKE BANK
5.37%
CAIXABANK SA
5.22%
BNP PARIBAS
5.21%
BANCO SANTANDER SA
5.19%
CREDIT AGRICOLE
5.10%
COMMERZBANK AG
5.04%
NORDEA BANK ABP
5.04%
KBC GROEP
5.01%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%

Diversification

EBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
52.50%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
EBNK
ZEB
ProviderEvolve ETFsBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield9.47%2.66%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 11, 2022October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about EBNK and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: EBNK or ZEB?
As of April 24, 2026, EBNK has returned -0.38% year to date, while ZEB has returned 12.82%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EBNK or ZEB?
As of April 24, 2026, EBNK manages $88.83 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.27 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EBNK and ZEB managed?
EBNK is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do EBNK and ZEB emphasize?
EBNK is most exposed to Financials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EBNK or ZEB?
Year to date, EBNK has seen +$21.00 M in net flows, compared with -$917.23 M for ZEB. EBNK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EBNK and ZEB compare?
EBNK has an expense ratio of 0.63%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of EBNK and ZEB?
EBNK's largest holdings include DNB BANK, HSBC HOLDINGS, and DANSKE BANK. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: EBNK or ZEB?
EBNK holds 20 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, EBNK is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about EBNK and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds