VS
When evaluating costs, EDGE features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.6% for ARTI. Performance-wise, EDGE has returned 4.16% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas ARTI is at 0.23% with +$1 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EDGE
ARTI
| AuM | $30.45 M | $23.81 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.60% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.67% | 0.97% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 30, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EDGE | +16.43% | +5.91% | +4.16% | +20.82% | +56.28% |
ARTI | +25.88% | +3.15% | +0.23% | +39.09% | - | |
| Flows | EDGE | -$2 M | -$4 M | -$6 M | -$11 M | -$39 M |
ARTI | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$10 M | - |
EDGE vs ARTI exposure
Countries
EDGE
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
USA
92.14%
Other
7.86%
Sectors
EDGE
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
Information Technology
66.51%
Communication Services
18.37%
Consumer Discretionary
10.50%
As of April 30, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EDGE
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
NVIDIA
10.95%
AMAZON.COM INC
10.50%
ALPHABET INC-CL
10.31%
MICROSOFT-T
9.35%
META PLATFORMS
8.05%
BROADCOM LIMITED
7.54%
ORACLE SYS
2.79%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY
2.44%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY
2.39%
INTEL-T
2.23%
Diversification
EDGE
Exposure data will be available soon
ARTI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 28 total
66.55%
Characteristics
Compare
EDGE
ARTI
| Provider | Evolve ETFs | Evolve ETFs |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Global Innovation PI Index - CAD Hedged | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.89% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 2, 2018 | March 22, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about EDGE and ARTI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EDGE or ARTI?
As of April 30, 2026, EDGE has returned 4.16% year to date, while ARTI has returned 0.23%. EDGE is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EDGE or ARTI?
As of April 30, 2026, EDGE manages $30.45 M in assets, while ARTI manages $23.81 M. EDGE is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EDGE and ARTI managed?
EDGE is passively managed by Evolve ETFs. It tracks the Solactive Global Innovation PI Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. ARTI is actively managed by Evolve ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EDGE or ARTI?
Year to date, EDGE has seen -$6.44 M in net flows, compared with +$1.31 M for ARTI. ARTI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EDGE and ARTI compare?
EDGE has an expense ratio of 0.67%, while ARTI has an expense ratio of 0.97%.
Recent articles about EDGE and ARTI
Top Canadian AI ETFs Rally as Nvidia Drives Global Tech Boom
Nvidia’s record-breaking rally is energizing AI markets globally. Canadian ETFs tied to artificial intelligence and semiconductors are seeing a strong bounce as investor confidence returns.
Posted on 6/30/2025 by ETF Market Canada inArtificial Intelligence
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.