VS
When evaluating costs, EQCL features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.65% for UMAX. Performance-wise, EQCL has returned 17.13% year-to-date with +$18 M in net flows, whereas UMAX is at 4.32% with +$499 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
EQCL
UMAX
| AuM | $71.75 M | $1,443.09 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.63% | 0.77% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | EQCL | +1.52% | +1.99% | +17.13% | +19.50% | +67.38% |
UMAX | +0.53% | -6.49% | +4.32% | +4.38% | +28.67% | |
| Flows | EQCL | +$3 M | +$6 M | +$18 M | +$22 M | +$62 M |
UMAX | +$2 M | +$145 M | +$499 M | +$633 M | +$1,475 M |
EQCL vs UMAX exposure
Countries
EQCL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
EQCL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
EQCL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
EQCL
Exposure data will be available soon
UMAX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
EQCL
UMAX
| Provider | Global X | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 11.06% | 14.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 10, 2023 | June 14, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about EQCL and UMAX
Which ETF has performed better year to date: EQCL or UMAX?
As of October 16, 2026, EQCL has returned 17.13% year to date, while UMAX has returned 4.32%. EQCL is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: EQCL or UMAX?
As of October 16, 2026, EQCL manages $71.75 M in assets, while UMAX manages $1.44 B. UMAX is the larger fund by AUM.
How are EQCL and UMAX managed?
EQCL is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index. UMAX is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: EQCL or UMAX?
Year to date, EQCL has seen +$18.08 M in net flows, compared with +$498.70 M for UMAX. UMAX has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of EQCL and UMAX compare?
EQCL has an expense ratio of 1.63%, while UMAX has an expense ratio of 0.77%.
Recent articles about EQCL and UMAX
Yield-focused ETFs and the Benefit They Can Provide Investors
ETFs that employ covered call-writing strategies can be effective ways to generate monthly yield for investors while still providing exposure to a security or asset class on a long-term basis.
Posted on 6/13/2024 by Kyle Anthony inStock Market
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.