VS
When evaluating costs, ETHX features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, ETHX has returned 17.34% year-to-date with +$4 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.47% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ETHX
XIC
| AuM | $10.51 M | $36,997.76 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.73% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 21, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ETHX | -9.80% | +29.26% | -17.34% | -39.28% | - |
XIC | +1.03% | +3.22% | +16.47% | +24.19% | +106.35% | |
| Flows | ETHX | +$1 M | +$2 M | +$4 M | +$7 M | - |
XIC | +$2,556 M | +$4,632 M | +$11,241 M | +$12,258 M | +$17,392 M |
ETHX vs XIC exposure
Countries
ETHX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.58%
Sectors
ETHX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 21, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ETHX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%
Diversification
ETHX
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%
Characteristics
Compare
ETHX
XIC
| Provider | CI | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum Index - USD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.95% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 22, 2025 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about ETHX and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ETHX or XIC?
As of October 21, 2026, ETHX has returned -17.34% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.47%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ETHX or XIC?
As of October 21, 2026, ETHX manages $10.51 M in assets, while XIC manages $37.00 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ETHX and XIC managed?
ETHX is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Bloomberg Galaxy Ethereum Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ETHX or XIC?
Year to date, ETHX has seen +$3.95 M in net flows, compared with +$11,240.85 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ETHX and XIC compare?
ETHX has an expense ratio of 0.73%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about ETHX and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.