VS
When evaluating costs, FAUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.6%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, FAUS has returned 12.63% year-to-date with -$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 29.41% with +$169 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FAUS
ZEB
| AuM | $2.07 M | $6,981.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.60% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.82% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FAUS | -0.67% | +2.28% | +12.63% | +14.62% | - |
ZEB | -3.03% | -2.44% | +29.41% | +44.28% | +178.22% | |
| Flows | FAUS | +$0 M | -$0 M | -$2 M | -$3 M | - |
ZEB | -$429 M | -$97 M | +$169 M | +$869 M | -$819 M |
FAUS vs ZEB exposure
Countries
FAUS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
FAUS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FAUS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
FAUS
Exposure data will be available soon
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
FAUS
ZEB
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 23, 2025 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about FAUS and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FAUS or ZEB?
As of October 20, 2026, FAUS has returned 12.63% year to date, while ZEB has returned 29.41%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FAUS or ZEB?
As of October 20, 2026, FAUS manages $2.07 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.98 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FAUS and ZEB managed?
FAUS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FAUS or ZEB?
Year to date, FAUS has seen -$2.39 M in net flows, compared with +$169.48 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FAUS and ZEB compare?
FAUS has an expense ratio of 0.82%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
Recent articles about FAUS and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.