FBAL
Fidelity All-in-One Balanced ETF

Full FBAL fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

When evaluating costs, FBAL features a management fee (MER) of 0.37%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FBAL has returned 9.33% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.76% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.0%Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 4, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
FBAL
-0.36%+2.04%+9.33%+12.07%+53.60%
XIC
+2.14%+4.22%+16.76%+29.09%+93.94%
Flows
FBAL
+$323 M+$985 M+$3,297 M+$4,938 M+$8,641 M
XIC
+$1,611 M+$3,093 M+$8,627 M+$9,722 M+$14,703 M

FBAL vs XIC exposure

Countries

FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.46%

Sectors

FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.19%
As of September 4, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%

Diversification

FBAL
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%

Characteristics

Compare
FBAL
XIC
ProviderFidelityiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquity, Fixed IncomeEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.00%1.93%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 12, 2021February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about FBAL and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: FBAL or XIC?
As of September 4, 2026, FBAL has returned 9.33% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.76%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FBAL or XIC?
As of September 4, 2026, FBAL manages $10.22 B in assets, while XIC manages $34.60 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FBAL and XIC managed?
FBAL is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FBAL or XIC?
Year to date, FBAL has seen +$3,296.93 M in net flows, compared with +$8,626.58 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FBAL and XIC compare?
FBAL has an expense ratio of 0.41%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.

Recent articles about FBAL and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds