VS
When evaluating costs, FCCM features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FCCM has returned 14.2% year-to-date with +$394 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 30.92% with -$484 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCM
HBNK
| AuM | $1,314.21 M | $753.49 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.35% | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCM | -0.97% | +2.50% | +14.20% | +30.94% | +113.62% |
HBNK | -3.93% | +2.18% | +30.92% | +49.35% | +155.47% | |
| Flows | FCCM | +$32 M | +$116 M | +$394 M | +$544 M | +$951 M |
HBNK | +$33 M | -$67 M | -$484 M | -$593 M | -$93 M |
FCCM vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
FCCM
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCM
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum GTR Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.82% | 2.62% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCM and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCM or HBNK?
As of September 17, 2026, FCCM has returned 14.20% year to date, while HBNK has returned 30.92%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCM or HBNK?
As of September 17, 2026, FCCM manages $1.31 B in assets, while HBNK manages $753.49 M. FCCM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCM and HBNK managed?
FCCM is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian Momentum GTR Index - CAD benchmark. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCM or HBNK?
Year to date, FCCM has seen +$394.05 M in net flows, compared with -$483.52 M for HBNK. FCCM has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCM and HBNK compare?
FCCM has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FCCM and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.