VS
When evaluating costs, FCCQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.1% for XDIV. Performance-wise, FCCQ has returned 13.2% year-to-date with +$353 M in net flows, whereas XDIV is at 30.3% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCCQ
XDIV
| AuM | $1,194.30 M | $6,455.35 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.10% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.40% | 0.95% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCCQ | +2.72% | +5.65% | +13.20% | +19.74% | +91.18% |
XDIV | +1.43% | +4.06% | +30.30% | +39.27% | +117.68% | |
| Flows | FCCQ | +$30 M | +$121 M | +$353 M | +$461 M | +$882 M |
XDIV | +$164 M | +$427 M | +$1,539 M | +$1,958 M | +$3,608 M |
FCCQ vs XDIV exposure
Countries
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Canada
95.01%
Sectors
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Finance
45.46%
Energy
31.18%
Utilities
8.97%
Other
14.39%
As of October 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
9.23%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
9.14%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
8.96%
Royal Bank of Canada
8.90%
Manulife Financial Corp.
8.82%
Sun Life Financial, Inc.
8.13%
Power Corp of Canada
6.55%
Pembina Pipeline Corp.
5.26%
Fortis, Inc.
5.22%
Restaurant Brands International, Inc.
4.67%
Diversification
FCCQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XDIV
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 21 total
74.88%
Characteristics
Compare
FCCQ
XDIV
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD | MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.41% | 3.06% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | June 7, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about FCCQ and XDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCCQ or XDIV?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCQ has returned 13.20% year to date, while XDIV has returned 30.30%. XDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCCQ or XDIV?
As of October 14, 2026, FCCQ manages $1.19 B in assets, while XDIV manages $6.46 B. XDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCCQ and XDIV managed?
FCCQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada Canadian High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XDIV is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Canada High Dividend Yield 10% Security Capped Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCCQ or XDIV?
Year to date, FCCQ has seen +$353.34 M in net flows, compared with +$1,539.18 M for XDIV. XDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCCQ and XDIV compare?
FCCQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XDIV has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about FCCQ and XDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.