VS
When evaluating costs, FCGS features a management fee (MER) of 0.85%, compared to 0.45% for FCIQ. Performance-wise, FCGS has returned 9.35% year-to-date with +$95 M in net flows, whereas FCIQ is at 18.63% with +$527 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCGS
FCIQ
| AuM | $1,250.46 M | $2,088.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.85% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 1.11% | 0.51% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.89% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCGS | +2.08% | -1.38% | +9.35% | +9.74% | +63.67% |
FCIQ | +2.41% | +5.88% | +18.63% | +15.94% | +70.10% | |
| Flows | FCGS | -$11 M | -$2 M | +$95 M | +$85 M | +$1,010 M |
FCIQ | +$38 M | +$122 M | +$527 M | +$624 M | +$1,218 M |
FCGS vs FCIQ exposure
Countries
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCGS
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCGS
FCIQ
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 1.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 25, 2023 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCGS and FCIQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCGS or FCIQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS has returned 9.35% year to date, while FCIQ has returned 18.63%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCGS or FCIQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCGS manages $1.25 B in assets, while FCIQ manages $2.09 B. FCIQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCGS and FCIQ managed?
FCGS is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCGS or FCIQ?
Year to date, FCGS has seen +$94.87 M in net flows, compared with +$526.57 M for FCIQ. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCGS and FCIQ compare?
FCGS has an expense ratio of 1.11%, while FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
Recent articles about FCGS and FCIQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.