VS
When evaluating costs, FCIL features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.45% for FCIV. Performance-wise, FCIL has returned 10.67% year-to-date with +$519 M in net flows, whereas FCIV is at 18.52% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIL
FCIV
| AuM | $1,370.01 M | $2,661.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.45% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.02% | -1.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIL | +0.08% | +0.64% | +10.67% | +13.17% | +55.73% |
FCIV | -0.46% | +0.83% | +18.52% | +25.05% | +88.21% | |
| Flows | FCIL | +$41 M | +$119 M | +$519 M | +$652 M | +$1,184 M |
FCIV | +$83 M | +$254 M | +$1,031 M | +$1,251 M | +$1,984 M |
FCIL vs FCIV exposure
Countries
FCIL
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCIL
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIL
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCIL
Exposure data will be available soon
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCIL
FCIV
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.19% | 2.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | June 10, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIL and FCIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIL or FCIV?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIL has returned 10.67% year to date, while FCIV has returned 18.52%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIL or FCIV?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIL manages $1.37 B in assets, while FCIV manages $2.66 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIL and FCIV managed?
FCIL is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Low Volatility GTR Index - CAD benchmark. FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIL or FCIV?
Year to date, FCIL has seen +$518.75 M in net flows, compared with +$1,031.03 M for FCIV. FCIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIL and FCIV compare?
FCIL has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about FCIL and FCIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.