VS
When evaluating costs, FCIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.35% for FCUQ. Performance-wise, FCIQ has returned 18.63% year-to-date with +$527 M in net flows, whereas FCUQ is at 13.85% with +$733 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIQ
FCUQ
| AuM | $2,088.05 M | $2,817.37 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.89% | -0.61% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIQ | +2.41% | +5.88% | +18.63% | +15.94% | +70.10% |
FCUQ | +2.93% | +3.79% | +13.85% | +13.48% | +66.83% | |
| Flows | FCIQ | +$38 M | +$122 M | +$527 M | +$624 M | +$1,218 M |
FCUQ | +$54 M | +$158 M | +$733 M | +$976 M | +$1,987 M |
FCIQ vs FCUQ exposure
Countries
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
FCUQ
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCIQ
FCUQ
| Provider | Fidelity | Fidelity |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD | Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 0.71% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | January 24, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIQ and FCUQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIQ or FCUQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIQ has returned 18.63% year to date, while FCUQ has returned 13.85%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIQ or FCUQ?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIQ manages $2.09 B in assets, while FCUQ manages $2.82 B. FCUQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIQ and FCUQ managed?
FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. FCUQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity US High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIQ or FCUQ?
Year to date, FCIQ has seen +$526.57 M in net flows, compared with +$733.29 M for FCUQ. FCUQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIQ and FCUQ compare?
FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while FCUQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about FCIQ and FCUQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.