VS
When evaluating costs, FCIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.2% for VXC. Performance-wise, FCIQ has returned 18.63% year-to-date with +$527 M in net flows, whereas VXC is at 15.12% with +$292 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIQ
VXC
| AuM | $2,088.05 M | $3,597.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.89% | 0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIQ | +2.41% | +5.88% | +18.63% | +15.94% | +70.10% |
VXC | +0.81% | +1.15% | +15.12% | +16.02% | +82.04% | |
| Flows | FCIQ | +$38 M | +$122 M | +$527 M | +$624 M | +$1,218 M |
VXC | +$23 M | +$131 M | +$292 M | +$414 M | +$820 M |
FCIQ vs VXC exposure
Countries
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
VXC
USA
61.92%
Other
38.08%
Sectors
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
VXC
Technology
34.96%
Finance
18.04%
Industrials
9.95%
Healthcare
8.62%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.88%
Other
20.55%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
VXC
NVIDIA Corp.
4.45%
Apple, Inc.
4.08%
Microsoft Corp.
3.31%
Amazon.com, Inc.
2.21%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.75%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
1.55%
Broadcom Inc.
1.54%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.37%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.10%
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.95%
Diversification
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
VXC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10,284 total
22.30%
Characteristics
Compare
FCIQ
VXC
| Provider | Fidelity | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD | FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 1.17% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | June 30, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIQ and VXC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIQ or VXC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIQ has returned 18.63% year to date, while VXC has returned 15.12%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIQ or VXC?
As of October 16, 2026, FCIQ manages $2.09 B in assets, while VXC manages $3.60 B. VXC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIQ and VXC managed?
FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. VXC is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex Canada China A Inclusion Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIQ or VXC?
Year to date, FCIQ has seen +$526.57 M in net flows, compared with +$291.71 M for VXC. FCIQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIQ and VXC compare?
FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while VXC has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
Recent articles about FCIQ and VXC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.