VS
When evaluating costs, FCIQ features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FCIQ has returned 15.43% year-to-date with +$488 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 14.24% with +$9 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIQ
XIC
| AuM | $1,993.89 M | $33,978.99 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.51% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.88% | -0.09% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIQ | -2.56% | +5.52% | +15.43% | +15.68% | +60.68% |
XIC | -2.64% | +1.72% | +14.24% | +23.98% | +88.02% | |
| Flows | FCIQ | +$38 M | +$122 M | +$488 M | +$648 M | +$1,153 M |
XIC | +$1,644 M | +$3,076 M | +$8,752 M | +$9,290 M | +$14,932 M |
FCIQ vs XIC exposure
Countries
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.46%
Sectors
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
41.74%
Energy
17.17%
Non-Energy Materials
15.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Other
17.19%
As of September 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.10%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.52%
Shopify, Inc.
4.12%
Bank of Montreal
3.45%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.34%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.00%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.98%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.72%
Brookfield Corp.
2.48%
Suncor Energy, Inc.
2.17%
Diversification
FCIQ
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 219 total
37.87%
Characteristics
Compare
FCIQ
XIC
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.15% | 1.97% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2019 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIQ and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIQ or XIC?
As of September 14, 2026, FCIQ has returned 15.43% year to date, while XIC has returned 14.24%. FCIQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIQ or XIC?
As of September 14, 2026, FCIQ manages $1.99 B in assets, while XIC manages $33.98 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIQ and XIC managed?
FCIQ is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International High Quality GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIQ or XIC?
Year to date, FCIQ has seen +$488.18 M in net flows, compared with +$8,752.46 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIQ and XIC compare?
FCIQ has an expense ratio of 0.51%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCIQ and XIC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.