VS
When evaluating costs, FCIV features a management fee (MER) of 0.45%, compared to 0.35% for IDIV.B. Performance-wise, FCIV has returned 18.52% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas IDIV.B is at 15.63% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCIV
IDIV.B
| AuM | $2,661.47 M | $2,410.47 M |
| Management Fees | 0.45% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.50% | 0.40% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.29% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 15, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCIV | -0.46% | +0.83% | +18.52% | +25.05% | +88.21% |
IDIV.B | -0.94% | -0.11% | +15.63% | +19.82% | +93.52% | |
| Flows | FCIV | +$83 M | +$254 M | +$1,031 M | +$1,251 M | +$1,984 M |
IDIV.B | +$129 M | +$437 M | +$1,605 M | +$1,765 M | +$2,005 M |
FCIV vs IDIV.B exposure
Countries
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
IDIV.B
Japan
19.36%
United Kingdom
12.29%
France
12.09%
Italy
8.32%
Other
47.94%
Sectors
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
IDIV.B
Finance
35.48%
Industrials
11.04%
Healthcare
8.74%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.39%
Technology
7.82%
Other
28.53%
As of October 15, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
IDIV.B
ASML Holding NV
2.58%
EDP SA
2.00%
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA
1.98%
Intesa Sanpaolo SpA
1.97%
Banco BPM SpA
1.95%
Volvo AB
1.92%
Klépierre SA
1.90%
AIB Group plc
1.90%
Assicurazioni Generali SpA
1.89%
TotalEnergies SE
1.89%
Diversification
FCIV
Exposure data will be available soon
IDIV.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 95 total
19.96%
Characteristics
Compare
FCIV
IDIV.B
| Provider | Fidelity | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.13% | 2.13% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | November 9, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about FCIV and IDIV.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCIV or IDIV.B?
As of October 15, 2026, FCIV has returned 18.52% year to date, while IDIV.B has returned 15.63%. FCIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCIV or IDIV.B?
As of October 15, 2026, FCIV manages $2.66 B in assets, while IDIV.B manages $2.41 B. FCIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCIV and IDIV.B managed?
FCIV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada International Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. IDIV.B is actively managed by Manulife Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCIV or IDIV.B?
Year to date, FCIV has seen +$1,031.03 M in net flows, compared with +$1,605.37 M for IDIV.B. IDIV.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCIV and IDIV.B compare?
FCIV has an expense ratio of 0.50%, while IDIV.B has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Recent articles about FCIV and IDIV.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.