VS
When evaluating costs, FCSW features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.74% for NSGE. Performance-wise, FCSW has returned 19.42% year-to-date with +$119 M in net flows, whereas NSGE is at 6.06% with -$219 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCSW
NSGE
| AuM | $564.71 M | $75.70 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.74% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.72% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 22, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCSW | +2.40% | +1.28% | +19.42% | +22.86% | +100.60% |
NSGE | +2.03% | -1.41% | +6.06% | +1.25% | +31.08% | |
| Flows | FCSW | +$13 M | +$40 M | +$119 M | +$148 M | +$235 M |
NSGE | +$0 M | -$17 M | -$219 M | -$415 M | -$601 M |
FCSW vs NSGE exposure
Countries
FCSW
Exposure data will be available soon
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
FCSW
Exposure data will be available soon
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 22, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCSW
Exposure data will be available soon
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
FCSW
Exposure data will be available soon
NSGE
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
FCSW
NSGE
| Provider | Fidelity | National Bank Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | Yes |
| Inception Date | June 9, 2019 | January 23, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about FCSW and NSGE
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCSW or NSGE?
As of September 22, 2026, FCSW has returned 19.42% year to date, while NSGE has returned 6.06%. FCSW is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCSW or NSGE?
As of September 22, 2026, FCSW manages $564.71 M in assets, while NSGE manages $75.70 M. FCSW is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCSW and NSGE managed?
FCSW is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. NSGE is actively managed by National Bank Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCSW or NSGE?
Year to date, FCSW has seen +$119.22 M in net flows, compared with -$219.12 M for NSGE. FCSW has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCSW and NSGE compare?
FCSW has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while NSGE has an expense ratio of 0.72%.
Recent articles about FCSW and NSGE
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.