VS
When evaluating costs, FCUB features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.09% for HBNK. Performance-wise, FCUB has returned 1.58% year-to-date with +$117 M in net flows, whereas HBNK is at 32.46% with -$509 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUB
HBNK
| AuM | $297.19 M | $736.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.33% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.35% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 3, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUB | -0.48% | -1.28% | -1.58% | -0.83% | - |
HBNK | -0.30% | +11.09% | +32.46% | +55.67% | +162.45% | |
| Flows | FCUB | +$10 M | +$32 M | +$117 M | +$173 M | - |
HBNK | +$7 M | -$91 M | -$509 M | -$686 M | -$82 M |
FCUB vs HBNK exposure
Countries
FCUB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Canada
99.59%
Sectors
FCUB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Finance
99.59%
As of September 3, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Royal Bank of Canada
17.26%
Bank of Montreal
17.04%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
16.90%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
16.41%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
16.05%
National Bank of Canada
15.93%
Diversification
FCUB
Exposure data will be available soon
HBNK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
99.59%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUB
HBNK
| Provider | Fidelity | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 3.04% | 2.59% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 24, 2025 | July 5, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUB and HBNK
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUB or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, FCUB has returned -1.58% year to date, while HBNK has returned 32.46%. HBNK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUB or HBNK?
As of September 3, 2026, FCUB manages $297.19 M in assets, while HBNK manages $736.43 M. HBNK is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUB and HBNK managed?
FCUB is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. HBNK is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUB or HBNK?
Year to date, FCUB has seen +$116.51 M in net flows, compared with -$509.07 M for HBNK. FCUB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUB and HBNK compare?
FCUB has an expense ratio of 0.33%, while HBNK has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
Recent articles about FCUB and HBNK
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.