VS
When evaluating costs, FCUV features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, FCUV has returned 17.94% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas QUU is at 17.98% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCUV
QUU
| AuM | $4,512.44 M | $7,442.83 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.38% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.83% | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 14, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCUV | +1.74% | +0.14% | +17.94% | +24.57% | +102.72% |
QUU | +3.79% | +3.73% | +17.98% | +18.76% | +92.58% | |
| Flows | FCUV | +$221 M | +$637 M | +$1,848 M | +$2,173 M | +$3,407 M |
QUU | +$310 M | +$919 M | +$1,546 M | +$1,936 M | +$2,561 M |
FCUV vs QUU exposure
Countries
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
USA
97.64%
Sectors
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Technology
45.27%
Finance
13.23%
Healthcare
9.35%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.71%
Industrials
7.65%
Other
15.80%
As of October 14, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.73%
Apple, Inc.
6.83%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.99%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.58%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.70%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
FCUV
Exposure data will be available soon
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
37.31%
Characteristics
Compare
FCUV
QUU
| Provider | Fidelity | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.49% | 0.94% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | January 24, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about FCUV and QUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCUV or QUU?
As of October 14, 2026, FCUV has returned 17.94% year to date, while QUU has returned 17.98%. QUU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCUV or QUU?
As of October 14, 2026, FCUV manages $4.51 B in assets, while QUU manages $7.44 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCUV and QUU managed?
FCUV is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value GTR Index - CAD benchmark. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCUV or QUU?
Year to date, FCUV has seen +$1,847.85 M in net flows, compared with +$1,546.41 M for QUU. FCUV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCUV and QUU compare?
FCUV has an expense ratio of 0.38%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FCUV and QUU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.