VS
When evaluating costs, FCVH features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.35% for XQQ. Performance-wise, FCVH has returned 13.74% year-to-date with +$121 M in net flows, whereas XQQ is at 16.28% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FCVH
XQQ
| AuM | $385.33 M | $5,977.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.41% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.96% | -0.61% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FCVH | +3.14% | -0.94% | +13.74% | +20.19% | +96.41% |
XQQ | -1.65% | +7.03% | +16.28% | +12.58% | +99.74% | |
| Flows | FCVH | +$18 M | +$35 M | +$121 M | +$167 M | +$282 M |
XQQ | +$473 M | +$498 M | +$1,034 M | +$1,060 M | +$1,591 M |
FCVH vs XQQ exposure
Countries
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
XQQ
USA
94.45%
Sectors
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
XQQ
Technology
66.86%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
11.68%
Other
21.46%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
XQQ
NVIDIA Corp.
8.52%
Apple, Inc.
7.42%
Microsoft Corp.
6.01%
Micron Technology, Inc.
4.76%
Amazon.com, Inc.
4.45%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
3.38%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.15%
Tesla, Inc.
2.93%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.92%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Diversification
FCVH
Exposure data will be available soon
XQQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
46.33%
Characteristics
Compare
FCVH
XQQ
| Provider | Fidelity | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD | NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.99% | 0.22% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2020 | May 3, 2011 |
Frequently asked questions about FCVH and XQQ
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FCVH or XQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, FCVH has returned 13.74% year to date, while XQQ has returned 16.28%. XQQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FCVH or XQQ?
As of October 28, 2026, FCVH manages $385.33 M in assets, while XQQ manages $5.98 B. XQQ is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FCVH and XQQ managed?
FCVH is passively managed by Fidelity. It tracks the Fidelity Canada U.S. Value Currency Neutral GTR Index - CAD benchmark. XQQ is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the NASDAQ-100 Currency Hedged CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FCVH or XQQ?
Year to date, FCVH has seen +$121.31 M in net flows, compared with +$1,034.26 M for XQQ. XQQ has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FCVH and XQQ compare?
FCVH has an expense ratio of 0.41%, while XQQ has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
Recent articles about FCVH and XQQ
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.