VS
When evaluating costs, FEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.38%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, FEQT has returned 14.92% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 18.18% with -$113 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FEQT
ZUT
| AuM | $5,718.58 M | $836.04 M |
| Management Fees | 0.38% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.43% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.82% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 20, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FEQT | +2.92% | +5.73% | +14.92% | +21.61% | +89.82% |
ZUT | -3.33% | +1.16% | +18.18% | +22.76% | +55.62% | |
| Flows | FEQT | +$165 M | +$436 M | +$1,819 M | +$2,955 M | +$4,605 M |
ZUT | +$12 M | -$49 M | -$113 M | -$54 M | +$196 M |
FEQT vs ZUT exposure
Countries
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Canada
84.68%
Bermuda
15.32%
Sectors
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Utilities
85.04%
Energy
7.95%
Industrials
7.01%
As of August 20, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.46%
Capital Power Corp.
8.42%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
8.31%
AltaGas Ltd.
7.95%
ATCO Ltd.
7.77%
TransAlta Corp.
7.74%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
7.65%
Emera, Inc.
7.38%
Fortis, Inc.
7.23%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.14%
Diversification
FEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.05%
Characteristics
Compare
FEQT
ZUT
| Provider | Fidelity | BMO |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Cryptocurrencies, Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 2.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 20, 2022 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about FEQT and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FEQT or ZUT?
As of August 20, 2026, FEQT has returned 14.92% year to date, while ZUT has returned 18.18%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FEQT or ZUT?
As of August 20, 2026, FEQT manages $5.72 B in assets, while ZUT manages $836.04 M. FEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FEQT and ZUT managed?
FEQT is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FEQT or ZUT?
Year to date, FEQT has seen +$1,818.74 M in net flows, compared with -$113.48 M for ZUT. FEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FEQT and ZUT compare?
FEQT has an expense ratio of 0.43%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
Recent articles about FEQT and ZUT
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.