VS
When evaluating costs, FGRO features a management fee (MER) of 0.39%, compared to 0.2% for PAGF. Performance-wise, FGRO has returned 11.11% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas PAGF is at 10.76% with +$21 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FGRO
PAGF
| AuM | $5,532.35 M | $213.39 M |
| Management Fees | 0.39% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.42% | 0.45% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 5, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FGRO | -1.77% | -1.85% | +11.11% | +11.25% | +71.85% |
PAGF | -2.53% | -2.91% | +10.76% | +11.44% | +59.98% | |
| Flows | FGRO | +$136 M | +$403 M | +$1,897 M | +$2,273 M | +$4,530 M |
PAGF | +$1 M | +$8 M | +$21 M | +$42 M | +$172 M |
FGRO vs PAGF exposure
Countries
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Other
43.82%
Canada
15.70%
USA
10.99%
Japan
9.73%
Other
19.75%
Sectors
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Other
43.80%
Finance
15.64%
Technology
7.10%
Other
33.46%
As of November 5, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
US46432F8427
11.77%
CA05574G1090
11.18%
CA74642L1022
9.82%
US46090E1038
6.97%
CA46137P2026
6.61%
CA74640N1006
6.48%
US46434G8226
5.47%
CA74642G1037
5.29%
CA74643B1031
5.06%
US0250727031
5.05%
Diversification
FGRO
Exposure data will be available soon
PAGF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 12,198 total
73.68%
Characteristics
Compare
FGRO
PAGF
| Provider | Fidelity | Purpose Investments |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity, Fixed Income | Equity, Fixed Income |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 3.16% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | January 12, 2021 | October 13, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about FGRO and PAGF
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FGRO or PAGF?
As of November 5, 2026, FGRO has returned 11.11% year to date, while PAGF has returned 10.76%. FGRO is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FGRO or PAGF?
As of November 5, 2026, FGRO manages $5.53 B in assets, while PAGF manages $213.39 M. FGRO is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FGRO and PAGF managed?
FGRO is actively managed by Fidelity. It does not track an index. PAGF is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FGRO or PAGF?
Year to date, FGRO has seen +$1,897.09 M in net flows, compared with +$20.72 M for PAGF. FGRO has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FGRO and PAGF compare?
FGRO has an expense ratio of 0.42%, while PAGF has an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Recent articles about FGRO and PAGF
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.