VS
When evaluating costs, FLGA features a management fee (MER) of 0.35%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, FLGA has returned 0.39% year-to-date with -$12 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.5% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
FLGA
XIC
| AuM | $389.37 M | $31,310.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.35% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.39% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | FLGA | -0.40% | -0.61% | -0.39% | +1.48% | +7.49% |
XIC | +0.59% | +3.22% | +12.50% | +31.70% | +89.28% | |
| Flows | FLGA | +$1 M | -$1 M | -$12 M | -$35 M | +$45 M |
XIC | +$820 M | +$1,912 M | +$6,530 M | +$7,821 M | +$12,618 M |
FLGA vs XIC exposure
Countries
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.41%
Sectors
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
39.60%
Non-Energy Materials
18.18%
Energy
16.99%
Industrials
8.23%
Other
16.99%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.42%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.32%
Shopify, Inc.
4.05%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.32%
Bank of Montreal
3.18%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.81%
Brookfield Corp.
2.78%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
2.74%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.62%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.55%
Diversification
FLGA
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 220 total
36.78%
Characteristics
Compare
FLGA
XIC
| Provider | Franklin Templeton | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.72% | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | May 14, 2018 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about FLGA and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: FLGA or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, FLGA has returned -0.39% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.50%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: FLGA or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, FLGA manages $389.37 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.31 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are FLGA and XIC managed?
FLGA is actively managed by Franklin Templeton. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: FLGA or XIC?
Year to date, FLGA has seen -$12.37 M in net flows, compared with +$6,530.40 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of FLGA and XIC compare?
FLGA has an expense ratio of 0.39%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about FLGA and XIC
ETF Issuer Series: Franklin Templeton
Franklin Templeton’s growing ETF product shelf. Read our analysis.
Posted on 1/19/2024 by Kyle Anthony inETF Ecosystem
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.